The Mr. Rogers’ Project, Part 2

Six years ago (this very time of year, in fact), Kathy and I settled into our home, here in Bryan, Texas.  It’s the longest we’ve lived anywhere in our 42 years of married life.  Coupled with a saner pace of living and working, it had (and has) me musing about what it would mean to put down roots in an area.  It gave rise to one of my first posts in this Zoe-Life blog, The Mr. Rogers’ Project—in which I spoke of my desire and hope to be about a more intentional neighboring.

The project is ongoing.  We’ve had friends on three sides of us move away, in fact.  (A new dynamic for us – as we’ve always been the ones to pack up and relocate.)  Saying goodbye to old friends, welcoming new, maintaining ties with the “old-timers”: it all demands a certain vigilance and diligence.

Coming across a September 2023 Atlantic article by David Brooks, entitled “How America Got Mean,” serves to rekindle my resolve to be a Mr. Rogers—a qualitative presence in my immediate neighborhood, yes… but, also, beyond.

It’s a lengthy and meaningful article—too much and too full to process here.  (Clicking on the link embedded in the title, above, will take you to a downloadable version.)  Here, I can only provide a very high-level survey.

In a few, opening paragraphs, Brooks…

        • isolates two [interrelated] questions which have haunted him the last decade: “why are Americans so sad?” and “why have American become so mean?”

        • invites us to look beyond the immediate explanations to which folks resort (e.g., the rise of social media, a decline in community action and involvement, a diversification of America that feels threatening to many, growing economic insecurities)

        • isolates a more fundamental or primal condition that underlies our American condition

          On this latter point, he writes: “The most important story about why Americans have become sad and alienated and rude, I believe, is also the simplest: We inhabit a society in which people are no longer trained in how to treat others with kindness and consideration.”

It’s a malady which Brooks attributes to a collapse (somewhere in the middle of the last century) of “moral formation” in our country—a formal and informal process whereby individuals and communities learned to restrain selfish instincts, to cultivate basic social and ethical skills, and to discern deeper purposes in life and living.

I choose to think of it in simpler, clearer terms: “We have forgotten Mr. Rogers… and the simple rules of life and living he taught and personified.  We’ve forgotten what it is and means to be ‘good neighbors.’”

Two things strike me as I consider Brooks’ closing discussion on how we might recover “morally formative institutions that are right for the 21st Century,… that help people become the best versions of themselves.”  (Both of these are my impressions, by the way.  I will leave you to your own processing of Brooks’ fuller and deeper prescription.)

First, we ought to be very careful in automatically assuming, as some will be inclined to do, that “moral formation” is a property and possession of religious institutions.  We ought to remember that Jesus offered the “Parable of the Good Samaritan (or the Good Neighbor)” as a critique of many of the religious of his day.  Yes, churches and “Christians” might be a part of the solution.  But, we ought not forget the ways they can be a part of the problem.

Second, for all the sophistication of Brooks’ argument and discussion, the way forward seems as down to earth and plain and clear as Mr. Rogers and his spirit – filtered here through the words of another pastor, Rev. Robert Fulgham.

I suspect that most of you have engaged it before.  Still, like Mr. Rogers himself, it’s worth sitting down and visiting with, on a regular basis…

Most of what I really need to know about how to live, and what to do, and how to be, I learned in kindergarten. Wisdom was not at the top of the graduate school mountain, but there in the sand box at nursery school.  These are the things I learned.

 Share everything.

Play fair.

Don’t hit people.

Put things back where you found them.

Clean up your own mess.

Don’t take things that aren’t yours.

Say you are sorry when you hurt somebody.

Wash your hands before you eat.

Flush.

Warm cookies and cold milk are good for you.

Live a balanced life.

Learn some and think some and draw some and paint and sing and dance and play and work every day.

Take a nap every afternoon.

When you go out in the world, watch for traffic, hold hands, and stick together.

Be aware of wonder.

Remember the little seed in the Styrofoam cup? The roots go down and the plant goes up and nobody really knows how or why but we are like that.

Goldfish and hamsters and white mice and even the little seeds in the Styrofoam cup—they all die. So do we.

And then remember that book about Dick and Jane and the first word you learned, the biggest word of all: LOOK!

 Everything you need to know is there somewhere. The Golden Rule and love and basic sanitation, ecology, and politics and sane living. Think of what a better world it would be if we all, the whole world, had cookies and milk about 3 o’clock every afternoon and then lay down with our blankets for a nap. Or we had a basic policy in our nation and other nations to always put things back where we found them and clean up our own messes.

And it is still true, no matter how old you are, when you go out in the world, it is best to hold hands and stick together.

(Fulgham,
All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten,
pp. 6-7.)

“Knowing About God” vs “Knowing God”

Listening to Dr. Steve Porter (delivering this year’s Heinmiller Lectures on Spiritual Formation at Nazarene Theological Seminary, via Zoom) has given me vocabulary for a distinction I have increasingly sensed these last few years in my life and living.

There are two types of knowledge, he points out.  (Actually, there are more out there, I am discovering.  But, these two are what concern me right here, right now.)

    • There’s “propositional” or theoretical knowledge: formulated beliefs about life and living that we give assent to in our minds over time (on the other side of some academic exercises)

    • And there’s “experiential” knowledge: living understandings realized and appropriated on the other side of our more deeply and personally and existentially encountering and relating with objects of life and living

Here are words which frame the difference between a head approach to God and the Faith (framing doctrines, being able to speak reasonably about God and the Scriptures, etc.) and a contemplative approach (in which God and Faith are more deeply and fully encountered and experienced).

Both have a place in our journeys, it might be pointed out.  (Merton would speak of “informational” work being the front porch of deeper “formational” work with and in the Scriptures.) There can be no discounting, though, the essential place and importance of the experiential in our journeys of faith.  Here, Porter shares:

H.H. Farmer contends that if life is going to be “formative of the Christian life and character… [it] must be more than a mere statement assented to by the mind; it must be realized with a vividness not incomparable to that with which we are aware of personality in another.” (Porter, Lecture 3, 13:00 minute mark)

And yet, how much of my experience (and perhaps, yours?) has been like that which Bruce Demerest confessed in his Satisfy Your Soul:

“I tended to view the Christian faith largely in terms of rational propositions, so I loaded (and probably overloaded) my mind with intellectual analysis. True, I could wax eloquent about the mysteries of the Trinity or theories about the Atonement, but I didn’t relate that well to God on an everyday, affective level.  I substituted knowledge of the Bible for knowing how to interact with God Himself, or a knowledge of His ways as He makes Himself known.”  (Porter, Lecture 3, 18:10 minute mark)

Amidst it all, I find myself praying…

Like Thomas, the Doctor of old** –
Summa wrestling with God,
I come to a place
of laying pen aside
and resting
my weary head.
It’s futile
and exhausting
and has its limits—
this dissecting,
this domesticating,
this nailing God down
(yet again)…
and thinking we can
and should.

With other Mystics
in sweet communion,
the dumbfounded ox
invites me
to slow down,
to breathe,
to rest,
yea, to levitate—
encountering,
contemplating,
receiving
God and Neighbor and Life
as they are…
and not as I would have them

**St Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225 – 1274) was a Dominican friar, an influential philosopher and theologian, and a jurist in the tradition of Scholasticism.  As a “Doctor of the Church,” he is considered one of the Catholic Church’s greatest theologians and philosophers.  His Summa Theologiae (1265–1274), often referred to as the “Summa,” is regarded as “one of the classics of the history of philosophy and one of the most influential works of Western literature.” (Ross James, 2003)
      Later in life, a series of mystical experiences (including the ability to levitate) would change the course of Thomas’ career and ministry–seeing him walk away [or might we say “float away”?] from all his writings (including the unfinished Summa), which he regarded as empty “straw.”
      Owing to his size and clumsiness in speaking, his peers referred to him as “the dumb ox.”

Recovering Our Wings and Finding Our Song

In several settings, I have heard Trevor Hudson share a story which he first heard from Carlos Vallas, a Jesuit priest working in India:

Once while cycling through the warm Indian countryside, Carlos became aware of a strange stillness in the air. Nature seemed to have stopped, as if waiting for something to happen. Sensing danger, he stopped pedaling, got off his bicycle, and looked around. Suddenly he understood the reason for the eerie silence. In the low grass a cobra stood up with its hood spread and its tongue flicking. Carlos followed the snake’s gaze. It was fixed on the branch of a bush just ahead. On the branch sat a little bird, completely paralyzed. He writes:

I had heard that snakes do that to birds. Now I was seeing it. The bird had wings, but could not fly. It had a voice, but could not sing. It was frozen, stiff, mesmerized. The snake knew its own power and had cast its spell. The prey could not escape, though it had the whole sky for its range.

Carlos decided to do something. He stirred the breeze with his presence. He tried to break the snake’s hypnotic hold on the bird by waving his arms. He shouted human sounds. Eventually his efforts were successful. Reluctantly the cobra lowered itself to the ground and slid off into the grass. The countryside came alive again with its surrounding sounds. And the bird, freed from its paralysis, found its wings and flew. It discovered its voice and began to sing once more. 

      (from Chapter 8 in Hudson’s Questions God Asks Us, “Do You Want to Get Well?”)

Hudson employs the image as a way of conveying some sense of the purposes of the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius.  More broadly, though, I see it as a metaphor which captures the nature and essence of Christian “spiritual formation,” or sanctification:

though outfitted
with wings and voice,
we nonetheless
become grounded
and silenced,
mesmerized,
paralyzed

till Grace
jumps
and waves
and shouts —
interrupting
this lesser world’s stare —
breaking
our attachments,
our confinements —
restoring
our song
and our flight!

“Restore to Us the Joy of Our Salvation!”

I am looking forward to being part of a leadership team — hoping to serve the needs of weary United Methodist pastoral leaders of the Texas Annual Conference at a retreat next week in Galveston.  (So much has happened over the course of the last five years or so – in our world, our nation, our denomination – to knock the wind out of our clergy.  Like the prophet of old, many wonder if “these dry bones can live” – the “dry bones” which are individuals and the fuller body.)

Among the things I will be sharing with retreatants is an invitation for them to remember their “first call”  — their first coming to Christ… and the importance of being true to and in that primal, foundational relationship.

You’d think it’s a given – holding onto these “first calls” as we progress into and through our “second calls” of ministry.

Take it from me, though.  I know.  What Buechner said about the loss of our “original, shimmering selves” can be easily adapted to describe the diminishment and loss of our “first calls” over time – so that…

The original, shimmering “first call” gets buried so deep that most of us end up hardly living out of it at all. Instead we live out all [sorts of other, lesser calls], which we are constantly putting on and taking off like coats and hats against the world’s weather.

It’s true to the Biblical witness.

  • There in the Revelation of John (2:1-4), we read words from the Spirit of Jesus…

To the angel of the church in Ephesus write:

I know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance… You have persevered and have endured hardships for my name, and have not grown weary.

Yet, I hold this against you: You have forsaken your first Love.
Consider how far you have fallen! Repent and do the things you did at first.

  • Elsewhere in John’s Gospel (15:5), we see not just their connection to one another but the primacy (i.e., the foundational nature) of the “first call”:

I am the vine; you are the branches.

If you remain in me and I in you
(there’s the “first call”),
you will bear much fruit
(and, there’s the “second call”)

apart from me you can do nothing.

In his Maturing in the Christian Life: A Pastor’s Guide, Neill Q. Hamilton laments this “first call” neglect among today’s clergy, writing…

The bitter irony is that Protestant clergy are the least churched members of their churches although they are always in church. The constant offering of the means of grace largely passes them by. It is as though the world’s famous chefs, as a group, suffered from malnutrition bordering on starvation. Clergy must come out of the kitchen and sit at table to be fed like the rest. (p. 138)

Yes, ever before Jesus commanded his followers to “Go and Tell,” he invited them to “Come and See.”  It is, in fact, an invitation which is and must be received as new and fresh every day!

A Holy Week Prayer: We Believe, Help Thou our Unbelief

A Holy Week Prayer:
“We Believe… Help, Thou, Our Unbelief”

Prefacing Note…
     On the other side of a full and eventful season of life, I/we return to this blog… and, more importantly, to a time and a space for a more reasonable rhythm of life and living.
     In late September, I accepted an invitation to serve (through the end of the year) as interim pastor of First United Methodist in Quitman, Texas – reeling in the unexpected death of their pastor and friend, Rev. Mike Cline.
     In October, my sister, Anne, died – succumbing to a combination of factors that included and were complicated by Huntington’s Disease.  (Her death follows the death of my brother, Bob (who suffered from the same disease), a few years ago.)
     In December, they found a lump amidst Kathy’s annual check-ups – turning January and February into a time of surgery… and some follow-up radiation.  (She’s okay, by the way.  If you’re going to get the cancer diagnosis, hers was among the kind you want to get–detected early, as it was.  We’ll live – and with a deeper respect for each other and the gift of each day.)
      Again, it is good to have fallen back into a more “normal” rhythm of life.  Life was never meant to be lived at the pace into which too many have fallen and settled.
T.S. Eliots words ring in head and heart: “Where is  the life we have lost in the living?”

Unbroken is Laura Hildebrand’s phenomenal recounting of the incredible life of Louis Zamperini.

Among its chapters are Zamperini’s recollections of years spent as a Japanese POW during World War II.  (Horrific it is to ponder the real evil that can dwell in the human heart.  At the same time, it’s profoundly stirring to see the potential of the human spirit to cope, even flourish, in the worst of hells.   Zamperini’s story, in fact, is one more entry in a catalog I maintain of overwhelmingly impressive stories of forgiveness.)

As I write — here, at the beginning of another Holy Week, one passage comes to mind — recounting the myriad responses of Zamperini and his fellow POWs, as rumor of war’s end first circulated:

“Bad Eye” [the nickname for one of the guards] said something in Japanese, and Marvin [one of Zamperini’s fellow captives] wasn’t sure he understood. Marvin found a friend fluent in Japanese, pulled him into the room, and asked Bad Eye to repeat what he’d said.

“The war is over.”

Marvin began sobbing. He and his friend stood together, bawling like children.

The workers were marched back to camp. Marvin and his friend hurried among the POWs, sharing what Bad Eye had said, but not one of their listeners believed it. Everyone had heard this rumor before, and each time, it had turned out to be false. In camp, there was no sign that anything had changed. The camp officials explained that the work had been suspended only because there had been a power outage. A few men celebrated the peace rumor, but Louie and many others were anticipating something very different. [Rumors were rampant: of a coming bombing of the camp, of Japanese plans to annihilate all POWs in advance of any American invasion,…]

The POWs couldn’t sleep…
A few celebrated.
Still, most fretted over the rumors–
unable to sleep.

Overhearing and taking it all in,
I find myself musing and praying–
here, at the beginning of another Holy Week,
here, in a world caught in a perpetual rhythm of Good Friday and Easter,
here, in the shadowlands:

Restless nights
spent amidst the rumors
that victory’s won.

Prisoners of war are we all—
seeking full and final liberation.

In the in-between
of barb wire and open tomb,
when will we fully believe?
When will we finally dance?!

Yes, Lord, we believe.
Help, Thou, our unbelief!